by Mark Dayton, Pioneer Press
August 17, 2009
Public pressure may be forcing the Obama administration to back off its deal allowing drug companies to continue ripping off billions of Medicare dollars at senior citizens’ and taxpayers’ expense.
It began in 2003, when Congress expanded Medicare to provide prescription drug coverage for seniors. At the last minute, behind closed doors, the conference committee added a new provision, not previously considered by either the House or the Senate. It prohibited Medicare’s administrators from negotiating lower prices for prescription drugs. Instead, Medicare was required to pay whatever prices seniors were charged for their medicines by the various insurance plans.
Being forbidden from negotiating lower prices and thus saving money is so nonsensical that it’s hard to find a comparable example in the real world. So, I’ll have to make one up. Suppose a law were passed that, since this newspaper publishes opinion columns, it must accept mine and pay me $2,000 for it. No negotiation allowed.
That is obviously absurd. Unfortunately, in Washington, absurd practices benefiting powerful special interests far too often become laws. And since Medicare pays for all or part of two-thirds of all prescriptions nationwide, this absurdity costs senior citizens and taxpayers an additional $85 billion every year.
When the Obama administration sought political support and cost-saving concessions from the drug companies, their principal lobbyist proposed a deal. The pharmaceutical industry would promise to find $80 billion in “savings” over the next 10 years to help pay for the president’s health care reform and would support it if he would protect its existing Medicare gravy train.
Unbelievably, a top presidential aide reportedly agreed to that deal, supposedly as a necessary price for overall health care reform.
That agreement reveals the awful truth I saw too often in Washington deal-making: the best interests of the American people come last. The first hogs at the huge health care trough are the insurance and drug companies. Their profiteering is the number one reason that good health care is unaffordable for increasing numbers of Americans. Yet they have the political and financial power in Washington to defeat change that is against their interests, even if that change would benefit the American people.
To their credit, three committees in the U.S. House of Representatives recently stripped the drug companies of their Medicare price protection, which would reduce the prices senior citizens pay for their medicines and lower the program’s costs to American taxpayers.
Their actions, which were clearly in the American people’s best interests, prompted the drug industry’s dash to the White House to negotiate its “deal,” which would have required President Obama to reverse his campaign promise.
Since the deal was reported, public outcries and objections from principled members of Congress have apparently forced the White House to renounce it.
Now is the time to keep that pressure on, by contacting either the White House or members of Congress. Tell them: “No deals” with drug companies.
Any new health care law must include what most of them promised during their campaigns: allow Medicare to negotiate lower prescription drug prices, which would lead to lower prices for all of us.
That would be a very good deal.
Mark Dayton is a Democrat who served in the U.S. Senate from 2001 to 2007. He is a candidate for governor of Minnesota in 2010.
by Dave Mindeman, mnpACT!
August 11, 2009
Yesterday the dismal ratings of NCLB again leaves many Minnesotans scratching their heads. How can we keep saying that we have a top quality educational system when the NCLB standards say that half of our schools are “failures”?
Well, its not the schools. Its the testing system. The original goals of NCLB have some merit. The need to find the strengths and weaknesses of how we teach a diversified student body are valid points of investigation. But the methods used and penalties assessed in this testing system are, in reality, an assault on public education. And this expectations game has become a government mandate without the resources to accomplish it.
Mark Dayton’s campaign sent out a written statement which emphasizes the point that it is not just schools that need to be held accountable. Here it is in its entirety:
No Child Left Untested
by Mark Dayton
I’m so glad I voted against the “No Child Left Behind” legislation, when I read the latest report from the MN Department of Education, claiming that almost half of Minnesota’s schools are “failing”. These terribly flawed tests are more about labeling schools and blaming hard-working educators than effectively measuring student achievement.
And since the rationale for “No Child Left Untested” is “accountability,” shouldn’t the primary responsibility for any statewide “failures” rest upon the department and its boss, the Governor of Minnesota? Yet, predictably, there is no ”mea culpa” in the news release.
Once again, politicians and bureaucrats blame our schools for lagging test results; yet, they refuse to provide adequate resources to educate our children successfully. It is not surprising that more of Minnesota’s elementary schools are struggling to meet increasing expectations. Educators cannot be expected to boost student achievement in over-crowded elementary classrooms of 30 to 35 children.
Accountability starts at the top. We need leaders who recognize the incredible job that our education professionals do every day. That’s why, when I was a US Senator, I began the “Excellence in Education” program to honor schools and school districts for the outstanding, and usually unappreciated, work they did every day.
I’m proud to have voted against a backwards education policy. But it’s time for Minnesota’s political leadership to again put our state’s commitment to education at the top of the nation.